Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 08:54:29 +0200 From: Heino Tiedemann <rotkaps_spam_trap@gmx.de> To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why there is a newer OOo port than the binary? Message-ID: <5a2fu3-prr2.ln1@news.t-online.com> References: <p2b0u3-ui41.ln1@news.t-online.com> <200609181516.05432.nb_root@videotron.ca> <h4g3u3-tp1.ln1@news.t-online.com> <200609181740.30871.nb_root@videotron.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nicolas Blais <nb_root@videotron.ca> wrote: >> > I don't like compiling OO either :) >> >> But you do ;-) >> >> > Have you tried the -x option ? You can portupgrade everything but exclude >> > openoffice like so: >> > >> > portupgrade -avx openoffice >> >> Oh, cool. >> >> My port is named "de-openoffice..." so thats the name for the -x >> option? >> >> Heino > > Yep, if it doesn't work for some reason, you can always use the full name. FYI: for the "-x" option this works 1) editors/openoffice.org 2) de-openoffice.org The fullname doas not work, because the new OOo has a newer version number. The full name is "de-openoffice.org-2.0.3". Heino
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5a2fu3-prr2.ln1>