Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:40:36 +0800 From: Yen-Ming Lee <leeym@FreeBSD.org> To: Anton Berezin <tobez@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20050922164036.GA97847@utopia.leeym.com> In-Reply-To: <200509220748.j8M7mYMT043867@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200509220748.j8M7mYMT043867@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 07:48:34AM +0000, Anton Berezin wrote: > tobez 2005-09-22 07:48:34 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > databases/p5-Cache-Memcached Makefile distinfo > Log: > Update to 1.15. Require perl from ports. Assign maintainer to perl@. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.7 +7 -11 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/Makefile > 1.3 +2 -2 ports/databases/p5-Cache-Memcached/distinfo Just curious... Is it a policy to assign maintainer to perl@ for the ports@ owned p5-* ports? -- Yen-Ming Lee [utf7:+Z05fZWYO] | KeyID:0x5EB52E51 | Taipei, Taiwan --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQzLehMnMx0NetS5RAQJqJgQAk7TcLpvo4ySExq77hEhrOqiHfccyZk+B dME33CY5v9EI6Ad8E8GFvTs8bySo4zCOxbLUUtAK9kyJ6mWVT5j9f5ea3qH1vz/T 2WD6kw1TLwf1y2OBXuRbYJBkGBdUzKRWNR7NtFgygVIdYzuoeEyTyn+G2++/vIYz YosV10kQQd8= =59w3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TB36FDmn/VVEgNH/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050922164036.GA97847>