Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 14:58:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke Dean <LukeD@pobox.com> To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware RAID Cards.. Message-ID: <20050526144506.G15918@border.crystalsphere.multiverse> In-Reply-To: <200505241356.39253.kirk@strauser.com> References: <429340EC.2080801@shadowguarddev.com> <200505241356.39253.kirk@strauser.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Tuesday 24 May 2005 09:57, Aaron C. Meadows wrote: > >> My question is, since that chipset is unsupported for hardware RAID, >> would I be better off to software RAID them, or get a different RAID >> card? > > What RAID level do you plan on using? Mirroring shouldn't use much CPU, for > example, but parity might put a bit of a load on a hard-working system. > > That's a good question, though. Several cards are listed in the hardware > compatibility notes, but they stop short of saying "this card is completely > supported" or "stay away from this one". What cards have people had good > luck with in practice? I've been using a Promise FastTrak S150 TX2/plus for close to a couple of years now. It supports two parallel and two serial ATA drives. I bought it to support my parallel ATA drives and then I thought I'd migrate to SATA, but I haven't done so yet. I've got two parallel drives in a RAID1 (mirrored) array. This configuration is discouraged by the manufacturer because the drives have to share a cable and failure on one drive will very likely lock up the system, but that's not really important to me. I'm more worried about hardware failure than uninterrupted uptime. I've been using this setup since FreeBSD version 5.2, and I'm currently running 5.4. The dmesg looks like: atapci0: <Promise PDC20371 SATA150 controller> port 0x9800-0x987f,0x9400-0x940f,0x9000-0x903f mem 0xfb000000-0xfb01ffff,0xfb027000-0xfb027fff i q 22 at device 2.0 on pci2 atapci0: failed: rid 0x20 is memory, requested 4 That little failure at the end has always been there in one form or another. It doesn't seem to hinder operation as far as I can tell though. I've only had to use the built-in maintenance utilities once to fix something, and that was after a really bad kernel upgrading accident. It worked fine. Overall I'm happy with this card.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050526144506.G15918>