Date: Tue, 22 Apr 1997 14:32:42 -0400 From: Sysadmin <danlaw@rust.net> To: Damian Hamill <damian@cablenet.net> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: News... Message-ID: <335D044A.60DC@rust.net> References: <199704181657.JAA02594@root.com> <3357C27A.63DECDAD@cablenet.net> <3357F448.34A9@rust.net> <335CA624.167EB0E7@cablenet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Damian Hamill wrote: > > Sysadmin wrote: > > > > Damian Hamill wrote: > > > > > > > There just isn't enough bandwidth... ever... You wrote this bandwidth quote, right? > > True. As the internet evolves the customer will be using it and the > > bandwidth they buy from you more completely. But will next month's > > debate be over CU-Seeme (sp?), RealVideo, Push technology, or fully > > utilized PPP connections caused by someone's new program to stop long > > transfers during web browsing, so that http can still take place at > > full speed as well? How to forbid, suppress, or eliminate such > > advances in technology as menaces to ISP profits, and yet somehow be > > able to present less services as "better service"? The above was my response, was that not clear? > > I didn't write this, I wrote the "isn't enough bandwidth... ever.." > line. This part confuses me. > > Please make sure you attribute the correct quotes to the correct people. Thought I did, unless this was not addressed to me.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?335D044A.60DC>