Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 15:00:32 +0000 From: David Taylor <davidt@yadt.co.uk> To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-15?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld doesn't like -O2 Message-ID: <20031211150032.GA70482@gattaca.yadt.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <xzpbrqfij0r.fsf@dwp.des.no> References: <20031210204642.27989.qmail@paladin.fortunaty.net> <xzpptevecd4.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20031211132010.2491.qmail@paladin.fortunaty.net> <xzpbrqfij0r.fsf@dwp.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > andy@splashground.de writes: > > And in this case, as far as i can see, the code does violate the > > strict aliasing rules. > > Yes, and you are welcome to send a patch, but there was none in the > PR. PRs consisting of nothing but a compiler error message are worse > than useless. Perhaps. It's still not too helpful to close the PR with the message "Not a problem report.", as it _is_ a report of a problem (i.e. a problem report). If it's an unsuitable PR, saying so would be better. The "not a PR" response is probably best reserved for spam/trolls/tests/empty messages, rather than reports which do actually contain a report about a problem, albeit an unhelpful report. Just IMHO, of course. -- David Taylor davidt@yadt.co.uk "The future just ain't what it used to be"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031211150032.GA70482>