Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 11:02:06 +0900 (JST) From: non@ever.sanda.gr.jp To: rik@cronyx.ru Cc: imp@bsdimp.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4/man4.i386 ct.4 Message-ID: <20040304.110206.36183582.non@ever.sanda.gr.jp> In-Reply-To: <404655DE.4060204@cronyx.ru> References: <20040303.102155.38697537.imp@bsdimp.com> <20040303.104935.73668905.imp@bsdimp.com> <404655DE.4060204@cronyx.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 01:02:06 +0300
> Renaming of one of the devices would solve naming problems but
> it would hit one group of users. I think there is a compromis
>
> 1. If we have PC98, man4.i386 wouldn't appear in such installation.
> So man ct wouldn't confuse scsi ct users.
Currently, no. Pages in man4.i386 are also installed for i386/pc98.
> 2. If we have i386 installation and man for scsi ct would be added
> we just need something like man4.pc98 to put it there and it would
> be hidden in i386 arch for Cronyx/Tau users.
Well, I have had ct.4 for several months. I was suggested not to
commit ct.4 into man4.i386 but to create man4.pc98 and add into it by
Warner-san.
Probably we can create man4.pc98, then copy and modify Makefile so
that we don't have to put copys into man4.pc98 (I am not sure here),
and change src/share/man/man4/Makefile,
--- /usr/src/share/man/man4/Makefile Wed Jul 16 09:03:29 2003
+++ Makefile Thu Mar 4 10:58:07 2004
@@ -355,8 +355,8 @@
MLINKS+=xl.4 if_xl.4
# XXX NOT IMPORTED: man4.hp300 man4.sparc man4.tahoe man4.vax
-.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE_ARCH})
-SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE_ARCH}
+.if exists(${.CURDIR}/man4.${MACHINE})
+SUBDIR= man4.${MACHINE}
.endif
.include <bsd.prog.mk>
Or maybe,
man4/man4.i386 common
man4/man4.i386/i386 specific to i386
man4/man4.i386/pc98 specific to pc98
// Noriaki Mitsunaga
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040304.110206.36183582.non>