Date: Fri, 13 Aug 1999 01:14:44 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au> Cc: gill@topsecret.net (James Gill), tomb@securify.com, andrewr@slack.net, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "Secure-FreeBSD" Idea Message-ID: <199908130714.BAA08901@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 13 Aug 1999 14:31:44 %2B1000." <199908130431.OAA23238@cheops.anu.edu.au> References: <199908130431.OAA23238@cheops.anu.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <199908130431.OAA23238@cheops.anu.edu.au> Darren Reed writes: : NetBSD's primarily goal is stability and portability although they seem : to discover new security problems more often than OpenBSD people do. By : that I mean problems which involve more than program X having a new buffer : overflow problem. Are you counting the hundreds of buffer overflows that OpenBSD fixed to begin with? I've seen many many many more buffer overflows from OpenBSD than from NetBSD. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908130714.BAA08901>