Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:58:05 -0700 From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com> To: jhb@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Lock order reversals that aren't problematic Message-ID: <200107301658.JAA17661@windsor.research.att.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>...since a lock order reversal means that you can get in a deadlock... Argh, of course. It's only not problematic if it's a uniprocessor and it doesn't take an interrupt at the wrong time. Sorry for being dense, I'm still used to spl() =) Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200107301658.JAA17661>