Date: Tue, 30 Mar 1999 15:19:38 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Brian Handy <handy@lambic.physics.montana.edu> Cc: Kelly Yancey <kbyanc@alcnet.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: support for larger memory Message-ID: <199903302319.PAA43671@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9903301521100.3294-100000@lambic.physics.montana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> So, I'm curious, why is it that we needed to break BSDI compatibility in
:>order to support large memory configurations. It would seem that the two
:>shouldn't be mutually exclusive.
:
:Or, perhaps, we broke BSDI compatibility for a lot of people (?) at the
:expense of those few people who are running > 1GB...
:
:
:
:Brian
Has anyone tried implementing the %ebx solution yet?
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199903302319.PAA43671>