Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 12:13:25 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT modules ports/shells Makefilepkg-install patch-bashline.c patch-builtins_shopt.def patch-config-bot.h ... Message-ID: <1092240804.731.11.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <282D8E76-EBB1-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 12:11, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 08:04, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > >> P.S. My recommendation is to kill both bash1 and bash2, repo-copy bash3 > >> into just bash and remove bash3 as well. > > > > Actually, we can't do that. In order to preserve all histories, we > > should delete bash2 and bash3, and update bash to 3.0....that is, if > > that's what all the maintainers agree to. > > Since there never has been a shells/bash port (only shells/bash1) we can > do a repocopy bash3 -> bash. Sorry, I missed the fact that bash 1.x was bash1 and not just bash. > When you think repocopying bash3 -> bash is > a good idea, just do it. I don't use bash, so I'll leave it up to those that know. > I'm fine with deleting bash1, but I think we > should keep bash2 around a little longer, unfortunately the bugs in the > .0 release seem not to be purely hypothetical. Anyway, this should > mostly affect complex bash scripts, not interactive usage. We we do the > repocopy we should fix the LATEST_LINKs of both ports. Just file the PR, and the copy will be done. Joe > > -Oliver -- PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBGkWkb2iPiv4Uz4cRAiyCAJ978nHo8Jo4P/kdHJKYpq2FeY0IaACgkiqC /Z66HkcRq/ll8TKviNdthXg= =ySCg -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1092240804.731.11.camel>