Date: 23 Feb 2002 16:35:47 +0200 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@mail.ru> To: sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12 pkg-plist Message-ID: <1014474942.503.58.camel@notebook> In-Reply-To: <1014460731.503.54.camel@notebook> References: <200202230930.g1N9UFG37572@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020223013358.A96699@hub.freebsd.org> <1014460731.503.54.camel@notebook>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-bqT6yz07RLMRjo3aoGwA
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 12:38, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 11:33, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:30:15AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > sobomax 2002/02/23 01:30:14 PST
> > >=20
> > > Modified files:
> > > x11-toolkits/gtk12 pkg-plist=20
> > > Log:
> > > Remove bogus `@{exec,unexec} ldconfig' - it is added by INSTALLS_SH=
LIB knob.
> >=20
> > Uh. It is NOT bogus. Perhaps you need to do a little testing to see th=
e
> > problem. I did not have gtk installed on my 4.5-STABLE box. So I did
> > ``pkg_add -r gtk'' and guess what -- no other port would see it until
> > I manually did a ''ldconfig -elf -m /usr/X11R6/lib''.
>=20
> The problem is elsewhere - I'd suggest you to inspect +CONTENTS file of
> the problematic gtk+ package and see if ldconfig call is there or not.
>=20
> > This really smacks me in the face and shows pissy communication skills
> > on your part. Since I just committed it a few hours ago; why did you n=
ot
> > email me to ask why I felt it was needed?
>=20
> No, it's your skills that suck. I can't find any e-mail from you on
> freebsd-gnome mailing list about that problem. The port is maintained,
> so that you have to ask maintainer first, and you knew that. I'm just
> trying to threat you similarly to how you are threating others. You are
> being very touchy when somebody commits without contacting you first
> even small, harmless and well-intentioned patch to some of your ports,
> but at the same time you expect that others will tolerate the same
> behaviour from you. I certainly won't. Please next time you are about to
> commit something into ports maintained by gnome@ or sobomax@ ask for
> approval first.
s/threat/treat/g (grr, I always confuse those)
Submitted by: asmodai
:)
-Maxim
--=-bqT6yz07RLMRjo3aoGwA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQA8d6i+oNu5t4iCBa8RAn7UAJwKuGSQyzKN+q/5yFCB4hc459ru+gCcC35P
zoVo07AcFrromFjIOXg06ik=
=182W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-bqT6yz07RLMRjo3aoGwA--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1014474942.503.58.camel>