Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      23 Feb 2002 16:35:47 +0200
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@mail.ru>
To:        sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc:        obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12 pkg-plist
Message-ID:  <1014474942.503.58.camel@notebook>
In-Reply-To: <1014460731.503.54.camel@notebook>
References:  <200202230930.g1N9UFG37572@freefall.freebsd.org>  <20020223013358.A96699@hub.freebsd.org>  <1014460731.503.54.camel@notebook>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

[-- Attachment #1 --]
On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 12:38, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-02-23 at 11:33, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 01:30:15AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > > sobomax     2002/02/23 01:30:14 PST
> > > 
> > >   Modified files:
> > >     x11-toolkits/gtk12   pkg-plist 
> > >   Log:
> > >   Remove bogus `@{exec,unexec} ldconfig' - it is added by INSTALLS_SHLIB knob.
> > 
> > Uh. It is NOT bogus.  Perhaps you need to do a little testing to see the
> > problem.  I did not have gtk installed on my 4.5-STABLE box.  So I did
> > ``pkg_add -r gtk'' and guess what -- no other port would see it until
> > I manually did a ''ldconfig -elf -m /usr/X11R6/lib''.
> 
> The problem is elsewhere - I'd suggest you to inspect +CONTENTS file of
> the problematic gtk+ package and see if ldconfig call is there or not.
> 
> > This really smacks me in the face and shows pissy communication skills
> > on your part.  Since I just committed it a few hours ago; why did you not
> > email me to ask why I felt it was needed?
> 
> No, it's your skills that suck. I can't find any e-mail from you on
> freebsd-gnome mailing list about that problem. The port is maintained,
> so that you have to ask maintainer first, and you knew that. I'm just
> trying to threat you similarly to how you are threating others. You are
> being very touchy when somebody commits without contacting you first
> even small, harmless and well-intentioned patch to some of your ports,
> but at the same time you expect that others will tolerate the same
> behaviour from you. I certainly won't. Please next time you are about to
> commit something into ports maintained by gnome@ or sobomax@ ask for
> approval first.

s/threat/treat/g (grr, I always confuse those)

Submitted by:	asmodai

:)

-Maxim

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQA8d6i+oNu5t4iCBa8RAn7UAJwKuGSQyzKN+q/5yFCB4hc459ru+gCcC35P
zoVo07AcFrromFjIOXg06ik=
=182W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1014474942.503.58.camel>