Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:43:42 -0800 (PST) From: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> To: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiqueue status Message-ID: <207313.79096.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20090303203015.GA31097@insightsol.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Multiqueue status
> To: "Barney Cordoba" <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com>
> Cc: current@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 3:30 PM
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:37:45AM -0800, Barney Cordoba
> wrote:
> >
> > I see some mention of INET_MULTIQUEUE and use of a new
> flowid in the mbuf
> > packet header, but don't see anywhere that the
> flowid is set. Is this a
> > future feature, or is this currently implemented?
>
> There is at least one driver, cxgb(4), that makes use of
> flowid. You
> can browse through the files in sys/dev/cxgb/ to see how
> it's used.
>
> Regards,
> Navdeep
Yes I noticed that. I'm working on igb/ixgbe for a commercial
application for 7.x, and I'd like to implement it in a way that is
somewhat compatible with 8. I'm just playing with it at this point
to see the performance trade offs.
Barney
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?207313.79096.qm>