Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:43:42 -0800 (PST) From: Barney Cordoba <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> To: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiqueue status Message-ID: <207313.79096.qm@web63905.mail.re1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20090303203015.GA31097@insightsol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Navdeep Parhar <nparhar@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: Multiqueue status
> To: "Barney Cordoba" <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com>
> Cc: current@freebsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, March 3, 2009, 3:30 PM
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 04:37:45AM -0800, Barney Cordoba
> wrote:
> >
> > I see some mention of INET_MULTIQUEUE and use of a new
> flowid in the mbuf
> > packet header, but don't see anywhere that the
> flowid is set. Is this a
> > future feature, or is this currently implemented?
>
> There is at least one driver, cxgb(4), that makes use of
> flowid. You
> can browse through the files in sys/dev/cxgb/ to see how
> it's used.
>
> Regards,
> Navdeep
Yes I noticed that. I'm working on igb/ixgbe for a commercial
application for 7.x, and I'd like to implement it in a way that is
somewhat compatible with 8. I'm just playing with it at this point
to see the performance trade offs.
Barney
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?207313.79096.qm>