Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 01:21:53 -0200 From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus@eternamente.info> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sil3124 + Sil4726 PortMultipier and FreeBSD9 Message-ID: <82bf04273014b38fc02a7c4068fb572d.squirrel@eternamente.info> In-Reply-To: <9eb3377e660857aeec7f640fc5a41221.squirrel@eternamente.info> References: <44b3c0f48d1cf64cc9237881c43c2be4.squirrel@eternamente.info> <CAGH67wTs%2BJQRKLyHzeHj5-GHbGEtrc7qto2Z1m997zmiO8=GKQ@mail.gmail.com> <30c6076d340bdb3546054609939139c6.squirrel@eternamente.info> <CAJ-Vmon-WiUC=wV-9NOUL7bfXFQB=7U%2BnZ4%2BbnpeNCuJ7tMeGg@mail.gmail.com> <9eb3377e660857aeec7f640fc5a41221.squirrel@eternamente.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, December 4, 2011 00:46, Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > On Sun, December 4, 2011 00:32, Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Why not just run FreeNAS? > > thanks for the tip on FreeNAS, as others said too. > > will it run some other services, as http server for some stuff (wiki for example), edonkey and > torrent clients, and some other stuff ? (I will visit the FreeNAS site and try to figure out) > > although it would solve the problem on configuring the box, I still have the doubts on the port > multiplier being usefull on it, as FreeNAS will end on FreeBSD :) > > this port multiplier will work ok ? On Sil3124 and which others ? > > the tip on FreeNAS was great, but my main concern here is the sata hardware compatibility. I'd > like to buy it knowing it will work :) > > thanks, > > matheus http://www.freenas.org/category/version-comparison unfortunately FreeNAS 8 won't be happy with less than 4GB RAM (I have 2GB on both hardware), and version 8 won't have http and torrent :( so far, I'll do as today and run FreeBSD 9 on its original form :) still looking for the port multiplier case, though. thanks, matheus > -- > Vítima da Oi entre 2007 e 2011. > > We will call you cygnus, > The God of balance you shall be > > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Vítima da Oi entre 2007 e 2011. We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?82bf04273014b38fc02a7c4068fb572d.squirrel>