Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:04:07 -0800 (PST) From: CJTT <cjtt@employees.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ti driver, vlan and tcpdump Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1011115135751.27853A-100000@willers.employees.org> In-Reply-To: <20011115134207.A26868@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 15 Nov 2001, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 03:41:21PM -0600, Shaun Marko wrote:
> > Could you also get the desired result by using a kernel without VLAN support?
> > The original poster said he didn't want to configure VLAN interfaces anyway.
>
> For the moment, on stable hosts, that will work. Driver vlan support is
> no longer optional in current and that change will be MFC'd just as soon
> as I get it tested. The right answer is probably to modify the
> VLAN_INPUT_TAG macro to do the bpf stuff.
I see what you're talking about in the driver (if_ti.c).
But I'm not sure if I understand you correctly
(I can't seem to find where the VLAN_INPUT_TAG macro
is located). Would a temporary fix in if_ti.c
be to just remove the vlan_input_tag() clause
and leave ether_input?
---
#if NVLAN > 0
/*
* If we received a packet with a vlan tag, pass it
* to vlan_input() instead of ether_input().
*/
if (have_tag) {
vlan_input_tag(eh, m, vlan_tag);
have_tag = vlan_tag = 0;
continue;
}
#endif
ether_input(ifp, eh, m);
}
----
Thanks,
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.3.96.1011115135751.27853A-100000>