Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 12:52:10 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFR] Remove texinfo from base Message-ID: <20140625105209.GC23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <20140625104540.GE86779@over-yonder.net> References: <20140625103107.GB23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625104540.GE86779@over-yonder.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--/If7Wv41KAW8wPhq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 05:45:40AM -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:31:08PM +0200 I heard the voice of > Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus: > >=20 > > The ports tree has received the necessary bits so it is now able to > > handle info pages without anything related to texinfo in base >=20 > How many ports does that break? >=20 > As somebody with /usr/local/bin/ before /usr/bin/ in his $PATH, I've > run into a steady trickle of ports over the years that break when > various ports shadow base utils, and texinfo is the prime offender. > e.g., recently (and still brokenly) lang/guile as > <https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D189386>; says. I have just committed the support for this in ports, anyway breakage should= be reported, right now it seems fine on my exp-run regards, Bapt --/If7Wv41KAW8wPhq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOqqdkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzExgCfdtdBM+SlTZ0utGoygQiLrxOx XOkAn3J2WzEByjBhmCFxdZl6ApCO+sVD =OrkU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/If7Wv41KAW8wPhq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140625105209.GC23976>