Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2001 04:35:13 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: bde@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/release/scripts doFS.sh Message-ID: <20010309043513.A28523@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200103090406.f2946Bs04692@billy-club.village.org>; from imp@village.org on Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:06:11PM -0700 References: <200103090103.f2913GQ88940@freefall.freebsd.org> <200103090406.f2946Bs04692@billy-club.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:06:11PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > Needless to say, this means that we are right on the hairy edge of > overflowing for the alpha install disk. We've been on the hairy edge with every 4.x release, and commit to the -current kernel. :-( On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:02:20PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > Why `-m 1' instead of `-m 0'? I was afraid some code somewhere would for some reason divide by the percentage free and not check for zero. If we are sure -m 0 will not cause a problem I would rather use that. > This change seems to have no effect. Trust me, it made a difference. :-) In fact I stuck in a `tunef -p' when I was testing this and found w/o -m X, X < 6; would still show the default of 8%. Someone mentioned that there may be a bug where `tunefs' will not set the value to 0. -- David To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010309043513.A28523>