Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:17:50 -0800 (PST) From: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG, sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG, Mario <lioux@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: USE_SDL Message-ID: <20030218011750.87059.qmail@web13504.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20030218010011.GA79596@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'll make a mega diff that inserts USE_SDL=yes, removes SDL_CONFIG?=${LOCALBASE}/bin/sdl11-config, and removes SDL_CONFIG from MAKE_ENV and CONFIGURE_ENV in ports makefiles, and then test it. Should USE_SDL go anywhere particular? I was going to put it below USE_X* and USE_GMAKE, but above most other USE_* statements... --- Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 04:06:32PM -0800, David Yeske wrote: > > ok how about this? > > > > http://pigseye.kennesaw.edu/~dyeske/freebsd/patch-bsd.port.mk > > I'd like you to test the conversion with as many of the SDL ports as > you can, to make sure the patch works as expected. > > Kris > > ATTACHMENT part 2 application/pgp-signature __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Shopping - Send Flowers for Valentine's Day http://shopping.yahoo.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030218011750.87059.qmail>