Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:31:11 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim <darren.pilgrim@bitfreak.org> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> Cc: current@freebsd.org, small@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Build option survey Message-ID: <44289FEF.7000008@bitfreak.org> In-Reply-To: <71543.1143437115@critter.freebsd.dk> References: <71543.1143437115@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <44270819.2080604@bitfreak.org>, Darren Pilgrim writes: >> Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >>> The build option survey is online again, now with all the new >>> and improved build options which Ruslan has provided us with: >>> >>> http://phk.freebsd.dk/misc/build_options/ >> If it's advised to use the same initial make env for building and >> installing, why perform the BuildWorld and InstallWorld tests in the survey? >> Doesn't that pretty much guarantee something will break? > > Study the table carefully, there are options that are only valid for > build- or installworld. Right, but these are make.conf options so they'll be present in the environment for both regardless of if/how they're used in either target. Why run tests with inconsistent environments?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44289FEF.7000008>