Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 13:12:34 +0000 From: "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de> To: Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: State of Elasticsearch and related ports Message-ID: <24BA4834-620A-42EA-B58E-18C86A7507E5@punkt.de> In-Reply-To: <aawUmaomyk9xPmMa@fc.opsec.eu> References: <A5C06584-C8B9-4978-B0FF-7FB9620D1A89@punkt.de> <aawUmaomyk9xPmMa@fc.opsec.eu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi all, > Am 07.03.2026 um 13:05 schrieb Kurt Jaeger <pi@freebsd.org>: > Update: there are PRs for update to 8.x (elastic fails to build, beats > depends on elastic). There are 9.1 and 9.2 PRs for elastic, kibana and beats. > > elastic 9.2 testbuilds look fine. > > As I'm not a user, can someone explain to me if we really need 9.1 and 9.2 > versions in parallel in the tree? I asked our local Elasticsearch guru and he cannot think of a reason to use 9.1 instead of 9.2 assuming the latter is available. It would be great to have current Elasticsearch ports and packages again. Thanks and kind regards, Patrick -- punkt.de GmbH Patrick M. Hausen .infrastructure Sophienstr. 187 76185 Karlsruhe Tel. +49 721 9109500 https://infrastructure.punkt.de info@punkt.de AG Mannheim 108285 Geschäftsführer: Daniel Lienert, Fabian Steinhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24BA4834-620A-42EA-B58E-18C86A7507E5>