Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:09:25 -0800
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@attbi.com>
Cc:        Darren Pilgrim <dmp@pantherdragon.org>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Is a port skeleton considered a derivative work under the GPL?
Message-ID:  <3DEBDA15.6EE31FB4@mindspring.com>
References:  <3DE9A680.4000702@pantherdragon.org> <3DE9B0CC.8A368E61@mindspring.com> <joadjo5j7q.djo@localhost.localdomain>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Gary W. Swearingen" wrote:
> Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> writes:
> > You are basically asking the question "What makes A a derivative
> > work of B?".
> 
> Basically, yes, but he's also asking, importantly, "how should I
> interpret the GPL's fuzzy and confusing derivative escape clauses?".
> 
> The prior replay concerning risk avoidance works well here too, except
> when considering jurisdictions and locations of actions, remember the
> case of the Central American leader who is sitting in a US jail.

Enforcement of derivative works of Open Source code is a civil
action, since the works from which they were derived is available
and derivation is not prohibited.  The issue is compliance with
contract, not compliance with copyright.  So there is no DMCA or
Copyright issue here, and hence no involvement of the FBI in the
investigation; it is very different than, for instance, the Skylarov
trial (which starts today).

The Manuel Noreiga imprisonment was predominantly over the drug
trafficing through Panama, and a regime unfriendly to the U.S.,
after the lease on the canal was allowed to expire.  His conviction
was on charges of drug trafficing, racketeering, and money laundering.

The issue of jurisdiction I raised was totally unrelated; my issue
was the input to the standard "lawyer risk analysis equation" which
would most effect the output: the existance or non-existance of
binding case law.  Case law is only binding on lower courts in the
jurisdiction in which it was ajudicated (i.e. the 3rd Circuit Court
of Appeals is not bound by the decisions of the 5th Circuit Court of
Appeals).  Only if a decision is made by the U.S. Supreme Court, is
the case law binding on all U.S. courts.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DEBDA15.6EE31FB4>