Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 08:41:59 +0000 From: =?utf-8?B?S2FybGkgU2rDtmJlcmc=?= <karli.sjoberg@slu.se> To: Mikhail T. <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: "freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org" <freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: NFS reads vs. writes Message-ID: <332f85ba-a440-45fd-acd9-5b9e2184131b@email.android.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
Den 3 jan. 2016 8:54 fm skrev "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com>: > > On 03.01.2016 02:16, Karli Sjöberg wrote: >> >> The difference between "mount" and "mount -o async" should tell you if you'd benefit from a separate log device in the pool. > > This is not a ZFS problem. The same filesystem is being read in both cases. The same data is being read from and written to the same filesystems. For some reason, it is much faster to read via NFS than to write to it, however. > > And finally, just to put the matter to rest, both ZFS-pools already have a separate zil-device (on an SSD). >> >> -mi Ok, so what about the local performance? Have you run e.g. Bonnie++ in the same directory? /Khelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?332f85ba-a440-45fd-acd9-5b9e2184131b>