Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2002 10:47:17 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: '-ax' option in gcc Message-ID: <20021123184717.GA23020@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20021123192600.0ab4006d.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> References: <20021123174502.703cc4cd.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> <3DDFB905.2030107@liwing.de> <20021123192600.0ab4006d.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 07:26:00PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Sat, 23 Nov 2002 18:21:09 +0100 > Jens Rehsack <rehsack@liwing.de> wrote: > > > You may also read http://gcc.gnu.org/ for details 'bout the new > > compiler and http://gcc.gnu.org/news/profiledriven.html for > > information about the new "Infrastructure for Profile Driven > > Optimizations". > > Yes, thanks for the info, FWIW I think it's quite against POLA to remove > an option yet keep it documented in the man page :) > The official documentation for gcc is gcc.info. The man page(s) easily get out of sync. -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021123184717.GA23020>