Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2024 17:17:17 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: filemon Message-ID: <f36ffaf3-dbd2-4f9b-a27d-923fb4fcb3fb@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <CANCZdfoZ0Gy%2Bzq8YfmBYCgJPsWyxm-7bk0W0vTrzpwRts6vRgw@mail.gmail.com> References: <ZqT6_a_0F8DCUsBm@int21h> <CAFDf7UKxhSu%2BqMGV1KahrSX9ho8vFut4avxNVX4D8QGa6%2B%2BTjQ@mail.gmail.com> <20240727170122.675f6bfe@ernst.home> <865xsn6ya9.fsf@ltc.des.dev> <a5471d18-7f88-4e24-8518-2c7a67ddd7f1@quip.cz> <CANCZdfoZ0Gy%2Bzq8YfmBYCgJPsWyxm-7bk0W0vTrzpwRts6vRgw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 30/07/2024 16:30, Warner Losh wrote: [..] > Does this also apply today? I recently read from someone on a mailing > list that the kld_list in rc.conf is no longer needed, that any > problems > it used to solve are solved, and that the preferred way is to load > everything from loader.conf. So I'm curious, what's the right thing to > do then? (I load most of my modules from rc.conf) > > > Either or for filemon. Either rc.conf's kld_list or loader.conf's > filemon_load=YES. I've been recommending loader.conf since there's > slightly less memory fragmentation, but even that effect is small. Only > drm kmod has to be in kld_list. I'm a bit confused. If I understand it right, you say loader.conf causes less memory fragmentation, but DES said "it still increases low memory fragmentation". So what is true? And is this something to watch out for, or is memory fragmentation not such a big deal? Kind regards Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?f36ffaf3-dbd2-4f9b-a27d-923fb4fcb3fb>