Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:54:12 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> To: Qing Li <qingli@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 138344 for review Message-ID: <20080323165342.C50685@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> In-Reply-To: <200803230811.m2N8BjAx005984@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200803230811.m2N8BjAx005984@repoman.freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Sun, 23 Mar 2008, Qing Li wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=138344 > > Change 138344 by qingli@FreeBSD-newarp on 2008/03/23 08:11:05 > > > This patch provides the backend of the equal-cost multi-path > support for both IPv4 and IPv6. Previously, multi-path route > insertion is disallowed. For example, > > route add -net 192.103.54.0/24 10.9.44.1 > route add -net 192.103.54.0/24 10.9.44.10 > > The second route insertion will trigger an error message of > "add net 192.103.54.0/24: gateway 10.9.44.10: route already in table" > > More testing is in progress. I intend to provide incremental support > for failover and connection load balancing across the multi-path. If I am not misreading rtalloc_mpath is used nowhere. Are you sure everything was submitted? -- Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT Software is harder than hardware so better get it right the first time.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080323165342.C50685>