Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 19:23:07 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, yar@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/make make.1 Message-ID: <20051012152307.GV14542@cell.sick.ru> In-Reply-To: <20051012.091330.53066886.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <200510121009.j9CA9aE3026075@repoman.freebsd.org> <20051012.091330.53066886.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 09:13:30AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: M> : yar 2005-10-12 10:09:36 UTC M> : M> : FreeBSD src repository M> : M> : Modified files: M> : usr.bin/make make.1 M> : Log: M> : __MAKE_CONF doesn't really belong here because it is M> : a FreeBSD extension of sys.mk. A xref to make.conf(5) M> : will be enough here. M> : M> : Requested by: ru M> M> I disagree. It is already hard enough to find info about __MAKE_CONF, M> and since it is part of the base system, this seems like an artificial M> distinction. I think that seeking __MAKE_CONF in make.conf(5) is straightforward. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051012152307.GV14542>