Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:43:56 +0200 From: Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org, Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de> Subject: Re: Two mceusb bugfixes for the code in webcamd 0.2.4 Message-ID: <20110709134356.GA91239@triton8.kn-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <201107091058.50634.hselasky@freebsd.org> References: <20110708211523.GA31038@triton8.kn-bremen.de> <201107091058.50634.hselasky@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 10:58:50AM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Friday 08 July 2011 23:15:23 Juergen Lock wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I just learned about these two patches that improve mceusb behaviour > > for /dev/lirc0 (I now can use another remote again without using the > > devinput driver, previously only the shipped mceusb rc6 one worked > > that way with the new rc code in the updated webcamd) > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/941072/ > > > > and > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/941052/ > > > > So I suppose these should go into the patches/ dir? :) > > > > Hi, > > I think you should ask the video4linux guys to include the patches in their > distribution. I want to avoid having too many patches local to webcamd. Yes I think that will happen eventually, I more thought about the current 0.2.4 tarball that people might want to test now... Juergen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110709134356.GA91239>