Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 01:24:56 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Message-ID: <20150213002456.GK29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for tha= > > t I > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the old = > .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > make > > =66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10. > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installation. > > > > Best regards, > > Bapt > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to > remove old make without notice ? > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources and that is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11) Best regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTdRFgACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ey6ewCffxD3H7f9ssYRxr0v4mWZJGlk XtcAnRpGs2VKWwj+9L73GlyLPyAv6h6t =jJzJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150213002456.GK29891>