Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2007 16:49:01 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr> To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A radical restructuring of IPsec... Message-ID: <ev5mku$3tq$1@sea.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <m21wix61iy.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com> References: <m21wix61iy.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] gnn@freebsd.org wrote: > The patch removes Kame derived IPsec from the tree, and adds v6 > support to FAST_IPSEC. The IPSEC kernel option is removed, but the > FAST_IPSEC option remains. This is a test patch and has a known > problem with routing packets through a node. Nodes can operate in a > host mode, that is they are the endpoint of a tunnel. Just a quick question: Is the reason for this simplification, performance, cleanup (I see spl...() functions removed), or something else? [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGFl3dldnAQVacBcgRAl6JAJ9vV6Eqz+CKchgGd5kjgpop/63YrgCfYFa0 XtdbGFmHFVz1LZXtw5DrvFg= =2Stl -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ev5mku$3tq$1>