Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 13:17:00 -0400 From: LuMiWa <lumiwa@dismail.de> To: Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg lock Message-ID: <20210812131700.61659f72@dismail.de> In-Reply-To: <daba653f-87fb-8dec-31c6-d4f59be3a6e1@kicp.uchicago.edu> References: <20210812125424.47ab3bb9@dismail.de> <daba653f-87fb-8dec-31c6-d4f59be3a6e1@kicp.uchicago.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 12 Aug 2021 12:11:15 -0500 Valeri Galtsev <galtsev@kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >=20 >=20 > On 8/12/21 11:54 AM, LuMiWa via freebsd-questions wrote: > > Hi! > >=20 > > I am using binary packages (latest) on FreeBSD 13.0-RELEASE. > > I have 8 applications where I have my own settings. Is it correct > > when I built the and install that I should use "pkg lock name" of > > port/package, please? Or is something other. > >=20 >=20 > If you build your own packages with custom settings using poudriere,=20 > then somewhere in: /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/ you will have pointer to=20 > your poudriere repository. Then, poudriere repository's supplied .pkg=20 > will take precedence over central FreeBSD repository's one, unless=20 > poudriere has older than FreeBSD repository version of package. This > is the advantage of using poudriere. >=20 > If you just build port, you do need to lock these packages, and their=20 > dependencies affected by your custom config. I'm sure there are > experts who do it this way who will provide better guidance for this > case. >=20 > Valeri >=20 > > Thank you. > >=20 >=20 Thank you. I lock packages because I do not want to build on my machine anymore. --=20 "Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself.=E2=80=9D Leo Tolstoy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20210812131700.61659f72>