Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 17:34:49 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Sam Lawrance <boris@brooknet.com.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: geom stripe/concat metadata suggestion Message-ID: <20040806153449.GH628@darkness.comp.waw.pl> In-Reply-To: <1091792300.749.14.camel@dirk.no.domain> References: <1091792300.749.14.camel@dirk.no.domain>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--OgApRN/oydYDdnYz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 09:38:21PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote: +> Would it be a good idea to store the device name, or something similar, +> in the metadata? +>=20 +> For example, if I have a disk divided like this: +>=20 +> |--------------ad0--------------| +> |-------------ad0s1-------------| +> |----ad0s1g-----|-----ad0s1d----| +>=20 +> The metadata is written into the last sector, so when the stripe/concat +> classes are tasting they can't work out whether it belongs to ad0s1d, +> ad0s1 or ad0. +>=20 +> I've had problems creating stripes and concats with this configuration. Ok, I decided to do it as an option, i.e. you'll be able to decide if you want to hardcode provider's name in metadata. Actually it is done already (in perforce), but I've to test it. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.FreeBSD.org pjd@FreeBSD.org http://garage.freebsd.pl FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! --OgApRN/oydYDdnYz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBE6UZForvXbEpPzQRAgI7AJ98QmRTeoMiGYAG3GzqxreV+nA32ACg79hH GDhBACrQJlfcyuN9gIju6pc= =d4Qa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OgApRN/oydYDdnYz--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040806153449.GH628>