Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2000 22:22:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Marius Bendiksen <mbendiks@eunet.no> To: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Conditionally removing cosmetic messages for small kernels (PICOBSD). Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10008022220320.34784-100000@login-1.eunet.no> In-Reply-To: <20000717152514.A2056@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> If I were to do/start the work on the rest of the system, would this be > acceptable? Initial patch attached. (There seems to be "quirk" fixes > mixed in with the cosmetic stuff, so the patches aren't as clean as they > could be.) This sounds like a great idea to me. I've been pondering hacking up patches for BUILD_TINY/BUILD_SMALL options throughout various system utilities, but I just haven't had the time to look at it yet. Being able to tune various parts of the build process better (memory footprint vs speed etc..) would allow us to tailor PicoBSD to more uses than we're currently able to. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.10008022220320.34784-100000>