Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 21:08:22 -0400 From: Eric Ogren <eogren@earthlink.net> To: Emmanuel Gravel <egravel@earthlink.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Other problems compiling kernel Message-ID: <20000716210822.B1577@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <3970E51E.316C25E6@earthlink.net>; from egravel@earthlink.net on Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 03:26:38PM -0700 References: <3970AC35.456F3882@earthlink.net> <20000715.21421900@bartequi.ottodomain.org> <3970E51E.316C25E6@earthlink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is not Linux. The kernel and the userland are not independent of each other. If you want to run a 4.0-STABLE kernel, you *must* run a 4.0-STABLE userland. This isn't something new to 4.0, 3.X worked the same way. Eric On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 03:26:38PM -0700, Emmanuel Gravel wrote: > That's fine if I want to follow the stable branch and update the whole > system. All I want to do is update my kernel to something more > appropriate > for my needs. I have 4.0-RELEASE right now. I know it's highly > recommended > to follow the stable branch but at this point that's not what I want to > do. > Has the ability to simply recompile the kernel been obscured so much in > this release? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000716210822.B1577>