Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 02:26:38 +0400 From: Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@FreeBSD.org> To: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>, "zvqops@di.vc" <zvqops@di.vc>, "ken@freebsd.org" <ken@freebsd.org>, "Desai, Kashyap" <Kashyap.Desai@lsi.com>, "McConnell, Stephen" <Stephen.McConnell@lsi.com> Subject: Re: r232411 breaks onboard 1068 detection Message-ID: <CA%2BqFSQ5=yBmGPqoDFRdW8nsJ=QzC=zQa3OLoJ=jusdyV_btL7Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120403215714.GO93449@alchemy.franken.de> References: <CA%2BqFSQ6nHXidbD2z%2B95E9a%2BqkMVyg4TU4Hac%2BG0qBU197-K5QQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120403082927.GH93449@alchemy.franken.de> <20120403122858.GA48373@alchemy.franken.de> <B2FD678A64EAAD45B089B123FDFC3ED72B96EF8E14@inbmail01.lsi.com> <A5E537D8E1B0EF499D49E9AE3E3458FE012DC44A6D@cosmail03.lsi.com> <20120403215714.GO93449@alchemy.franken.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> w= rote: > On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 03:52:14PM -0600, McConnell, Stephen wrote: >> Marius, >> >> Since the 0x59 device is a MegaRAID device, shouldn't you be using the M= egaRAID driver. =C2=A0Why is the MPT driver being used in this case? =C2=A0= The problem is that the MPT driver was wrongly attaching to some MegaRAID c= ontrollers and that was causing conflict problems, so that was fixed by rem= oving MegaRAID ID's from the MPT driver. > > Apparently, the 0x59 devices worked just fine using mpt(4) before r232411= . > Are MegaRAID devices backwards-compatible so they can alternatively be > driven by MPT drivers? The device in question is a built-in 1068-based controller on a SuperMicro X8ST3 board. It can be converted to MegaRAID mode with a special addon "button" (AOC-IButton68). http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon3000/X58/X8ST3-F.cfm
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BqFSQ5=yBmGPqoDFRdW8nsJ=QzC=zQa3OLoJ=jusdyV_btL7Q>