Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 16:13:10 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> Cc: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How much better are 64 but platforms Message-ID: <20031030001309.GA19454@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <3FA00634.6000002@potentialtech.com> References: <3FA00634.6000002@potentialtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 01:25:56PM -0500, Bill Moran wrote: > I've got > a client asking me, "How much faster would this run if we put it on an=20 > Itanium." I'd recommend amd64 over itanic..the latter is a vastly complicated processor to support, and gcc apparently does not produce very good code for it. Kris --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/oFeVWry0BWjoQKURAnXPAKDP/kdLgb56usQkoFl5NSNEKx4RzACg5gnB 0O0zjNobN32RST1yGOkVMXE= =EXlf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031030001309.GA19454>