Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:57:40 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Kip Macy <kip.macy@gmail.com> Cc: Nikolay Kalev <nkalev@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sun4v Tinderbox ! Message-ID: <466CF264.3040409@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <b1fa29170706102037r19fb8ecaqc4b2fed96da31392@mail.gmail.com> References: <136a340a0706102032m56573d08h83fccb0656d373f2@mail.gmail.com> <b1fa29170706102037r19fb8ecaqc4b2fed96da31392@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kip Macy wrote: > I'm going to give Xu a couple more days to fix the fallout from his > pcpu changes. > > -Kip > > On 6/10/07, Nikolay Kalev <nkalev@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Can someone please fix the sun4v tree so others can test their code on >> recent ? >> >> Yes, I know, but adding a pad field to pcpu is not a complete solution, this can be broken again in future by someone who does not notice this. should we put a constraint on pcpu structure, for example: put a __align(64) there ? Regards, David Xu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?466CF264.3040409>