Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:49:13 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> Cc: Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> Subject: Re: Multiple choices for RAID-0, best performance? Message-ID: <20040625064913.GB33437@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <p0600207bbd0080d2d8df@[10.0.1.3]> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAArboJgGwHU0apkIeCcojdKwEAAAAA@telia.com> <p0600207bbd0080d2d8df@[10.0.1.3]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 03:02:33PM +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: > That takes us back down to geom-vinum, geom-stripe, perhaps some > SCSI RAID controllers which aren't affected by any of the ATA stuff, > and maybe ccd. Why "maybe ccd"?? It works fine. I've been using ccd(4) for the past 4 years for all my FreeBSD development drive space. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040625064913.GB33437>