Date: Sat, 06 Sep 1997 20:09:30 -0600 From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> To: S ren Schmidt <sos@sos.freebsd.dk> Cc: mal@algonet.se (Mats Lofkvist), current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: lousy disk perf. under cpu load (was IDE vs SCSI) Message-ID: <199709070212.UAA26212@pluto.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 06 Sep 1997 23:40:24 %2B0200." <199709062140.XAA07333@sos.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>This is about half the rate as on an unloaded system... >So maybe this is handled better in current, or EIDE w/DMA is not >as bad as people think. The only advantage with SCSI these days >seems to be the ability to add more than 4 devices easily, and >to add them externally of the machine. But then again you have to >pay solid bucks to get that :) Don't forget tagged queueing. >-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- >Søren Schmidt (sos@FreeBSD.org) FreeBSD Core Team > Even more code to hack -- will it ever end >.. -- Justin T. Gibbs =========================================== FreeBSD: Turning PCs into workstations ===========================================
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709070212.UAA26212>