Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2019 12:54:22 -0800 From: Conrad Meyer <cem@freebsd.org> To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> Cc: src-committers <src-committers@freebsd.org>, svn-src-all <svn-src-all@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head <svn-src-head@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r355024 - in head/sys: kern net sys Message-ID: <CAG6CVpX9yrUrHwxyuSiY-3hHycm6gt=dRN7YPeJ_Q8Kbp4=9SA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2F916664-B316-4F61-810C-31D753FAC9B2@lists.zabbadoz.net> References: <201911222323.xAMNNfwi027342@repo.freebsd.org> <2F916664-B316-4F61-810C-31D753FAC9B2@lists.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry, should be: Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22504 On Sat, Nov 23, 2019 at 2:57 AM Bjoern A. Zeeb <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> wrote: > > On 22 Nov 2019, at 23:23, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > Author: cem > > Date: Fri Nov 22 23:23:40 2019 > > New Revision: 355024 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/355024 > > > > Log: > > Add explicit SI_SUB_EPOCH > > > > Add explicit SI_SUB_EPOCH, after SI_SUB_TASKQ and before SI_SUB_SMP > > (EARLY_AP_STARTUP). Rename existing "SI_SUB_TASKQ + 1" to > > SI_SUB_EPOCH. > > > > epoch(9) consumers cannot epoch_alloc() before > > SI_SUB_EPOCH:SI_ORDER_SECOND, > > but likely should allocate before SI_SUB_SMP. Prior to this change, > > consumers (well, epoch itself, and net/if.c) just open-coded the > > SI_SUB_TASKQ + 1 order to match epoch.c, but this was fragile. > > > > Reviewed by: mmacy > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22503 > > That=E2=80=99s the wrong review URL?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAG6CVpX9yrUrHwxyuSiY-3hHycm6gt=dRN7YPeJ_Q8Kbp4=9SA>