Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 02:32:30 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum in 4.x poor performer? Message-ID: <20050209022929.D94338@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20050209011528.X94338@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20050208231208.B94338@ganymede.hub.org> <20050209002232.B94338@ganymede.hub.org> <20050209011528.X94338@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Is there a command that I can run that provide me the syscall/sec value, that I could use in a script? I know vmstat reports it, but is there an easier way the having to parse the output? a perl module maybe, that already does it? Thanks ... On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Dan Nelson wrote: > >> Details on the array's performance, I think. Software RAID5 will >> definitely have poor write performance (logging disks solve that >> problem but vinum doesn't do that), but should have excellent read >> rates. From this output, however: >> >>> systat -v output help: >>> 4 users Load 4.64 5.58 5.77 >> >>> Proc:r p d s w Csw Trp Sys Int Sof Flt >>> 24 9282 949 8414***** 678 349 8198 >> >>> 54.6%Sys 0.2%Intr 45.2%User 0.0%Nice 0.0%Idl >> >>> Disks da0 da1 da2 da3 da4 pass0 pass1 >>> KB/t 5.32 9.50 12.52 16.00 9.00 0.00 0.00 >>> tps 23 2 4 3 1 0 0 >>> MB/s 0.12 0.01 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.00 0.00 >>> % busy 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 >> >> , it looks like your disks aren't being touched at all. You are doing >> over 99999 syscalls/second, though, which is mighty high. The 50% Sys >> doesn't look good either. You may have a runaway process doing some >> syscall over and over. If this is not an MPSAFE syscall (see >> /sys/kern/syscalls.master ), it will also prevent other processes from >> making non-MPSAFE syscalls, and in 4.x that's most of them. > > Wow, that actually pointed me in the right direction, I think ... I just > killed an http process that was using alot of CPU, and syscalls drop'd down > to a numeric value again ... I'm still curious as to why this only seem sto > affect my Dual-Xeon box though :( > > Thanks ... > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050209022929.D94338>