Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:44:37 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org>, Marius Strobl <marius@freebsd.org>, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard Makefile ports/x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard/files patch-at_scancode.c patch-bsd_kbd.c Message-ID: <20071026154437.GA7312@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20071025192819.GF70883@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> References: <200710242013.l9OKDPPW045914@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071025105820.GA99609@FreeBSD.org> <20071025110109.GA3374@k7.mavetju> <20071025112222.GA3415@FreeBSD.org> <20071025192819.GF70883@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 05:28:19AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:22:22AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >P.S. I'm starting to get a bit frustrated about the whole X.org 7.x > >thing. With every release of it, something gets broken, and nothing > >gets fixed. > > I'll second that. IMO, 7.3 is a regression on 7.2 in both reliability > and functionality. The underlying problem seems to be that X.org are > no longer doing any integration testing: They produce several hundred > software packages but don't bother confirming that they actually work. Ditto. x11@, how feasible is using our current Ports Collection with XFree86 as X implementation? I'd like to propose extending deprecation date for XFree86-4 or even allow the latter to be an officially supported X implementation for a time being (until X.org guys prove they actually *can* develop stable software). ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071026154437.GA7312>