Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:41:54 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: "Russell E. Meek" <russell@russellmeek.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SCHED_ULE Scheduler FreeBSD 6 - Release Message-ID: <20051124204154.GA30073@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <43854C94.6040206@russellmeek.net> References: <4384E8F6.6070308@russellmeek.net> <20051124024033.GB13075@xor.obsecurity.org> <43854C94.6040206@russellmeek.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 12:16:04AM -0500, Russell E. Meek wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:11:02PM -0500, Russell Meek wrote: > > > > > >>Is anyone here currently using the *SCHED_ULE* scheduler in a server > >>enviroment, production or non? > >> > >>Pros? Cons? > >> > >> > > > >This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well > >to research the answer before asking :) > > > >It's slower on the workloads I've tested and is not stable on machines > >with many CPUs (e.g. 12). > > > >Kris > > > > > Kris, > > This question has been asked quite often, so you would have done well > to research the answer before asking :) > > Shitty remark, not wise to jump to conclusions. > > > Common Sense would dictate that it would be highly retarded for me to > ask a question that I have not at least ever so slightly attempted to > look into. Since when has common sense ever been a guide to human behaviour? :-) Sorry for being snippy, it's just that I've answered this question about 24 times in public. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDhiWRWry0BWjoQKURAjF7AJ0aSf2jPEMTIMMHx87zvdDCpfe6cgCbBJOo 3Wjx7tNVO3v5F+97vSRfBzo= =lRbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051124204154.GA30073>