Date: Mon, 7 Apr 1997 08:24:10 +0100 (BST) From: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> To: Thomas Gellekum <tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Cc: Doug Rabson <dfr@freefall.freebsd.org>, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/nfs nfs_subs.c nfs_vfsops.c nfs_vnops.c nfsnode.h Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970407082238.654N-100000@herring.nlsystems.com> In-Reply-To: <87vi5zxsmw.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7 Apr 1997, Thomas Gellekum wrote: > Doug Rabson <dfr@freefall.freebsd.org> writes: > > > dfr 97/04/04 09:49:38 > > > > Modified: sys/nfs nfs_subs.c nfs_vfsops.c nfs_vnops.c nfsnode.h > > Log: > > Fix various bugs in the locking protocol, allowing proper shared locks > > to be used. This should fix the lock panics that people are seeing. > > 2.2 candidate? The problem is not as severe in 2.2 and it requires the locking infrastructure from Lite2 to make it work. Maybe Lite2 could be considered as a 2.2.5 candidate if it proves itself over the next few weeks? -- Doug Rabson Mail: dfr@nlsystems.com Nonlinear Systems Ltd. Phone: +44 181 951 1891
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95q.970407082238.654N-100000>