Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Dec 1998 14:50:01 -0700
From:      pekarske_bob@burr-brown.com
To:        Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com>
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, pekarske_bob@u2.bbrown.com
Subject:   Re: Y2K
Message-ID:  <072566E8.007691E6.00@coral.bbrown.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I really think I understand your point, but I write not as a contributor to
your software but as a consumer of it. If I had written a module, I would
be in a good possition to evaluate my code for Y2K compliance. But I did
not.

I am looking at FreeBSD as another contender for our corporate platforms. I
like it because it is open source. The low cost is secondary. Other vendors
have done extensive Y2k testing of there products. Your page gives the
impression you have not.

I believe most companies will not / cannot do extensive testing of
purchased products for Y2k. They will seek vendor compliance statements and
then chose a course of action - usually upgrade or replace.

I believe it would be in FreeBSD's best interests to be able to provide an
upgrade path.

==============================================

If someone had organized a Y2K compliance project, and was looking for
volunteers to check different parts, I would volunteer to take a piece. I
would be able/willing to become sufficiently expert on one piece if it
would contribute to the larger effort. However, I am in no position to
tackle the entire certification.

Most of us use the open source in reactive fashion. We experience a bug, we
read the relevant code, and we try to fix it. Y2K requires a proactive
solution.

Thank you for listening.






Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com> on 12/28/98 02:32:39 PM

To:   Bob Pekarske <pekarske_bob@u2.bbrown.com>, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
cc:   pekarske_bob@u2.bbrown.com (bcc: Bob Pekarske/Tuc/BB1)
Subject:  Re: Y2K




On Mon, Dec 28, 1998 at 02:10:17PM +0000, Bob Pekarske wrote:
> GREAT! But please don't leave your site the way it is now. My fellows in
> industry CANNOT take it seriously, and we will not test it for you. My
> management will simply say "I told you that was an unsupported OS.
> Convert to a real system before 2000."
Why won't you test it for us?  FreeBSD is a volunteer-based project.
If this issue is important to you, then you should be willing to
invest the effort to address it.  Asking other people to do this work
(which is likely to be tedious and dull) is not likely to work very
well.
Another alternative would be to hire a consultant to audit the code
for you.  Money is a great incentive for people to do things that
they're otherwise unlikely to do.
Matthew
--
Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com> * UNIX is a lever for the intellect. -J.R.
Mashey
http://www.pobox.com/~mph/pgp.key for PGP public key 0x67203349.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?072566E8.007691E6.00>