Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 May 1998 14:11:11 -0300 (EST)
From:      Luiz de Barros <luiz@nlink.com.br>
To:        Edwin Culp <eculp@ver1.telmex.net.mx>
Cc:        isp@FreeBSD.ORG, support@etinc.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Cabling problems with etinc?
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980528140025.7871A-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br>
In-Reply-To: <356D81FC.4DD7438A@ver1.telmex.net.mx>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dear Edwin and ALL,

I think i was not very clear.
We have now a pathrouter here and a Cisco 2509 router on the other side (
The backbone presence provider ). The connection is at 256Kbps via
fractional E1.
I would like to put one of the ports from etinc ( 0 or 1 ) connected to
the CSU/DSU ( Converter ) and take out the cyclades router ( FreeBSD is
quite better than a single router ).
My CSU/DSU has a V.35 cable that works very fine with no problem if i
connect it to a Cyclades, Cisco, IBM router  but not with etinc ( putting
etinc instead of the router ).
I thought it could be a cable incompatibility but it seems quite strange,
as all routers work with it. I tryed connecting RXclockA to TxclockA and
TxclockB to RxclockB on etinc but it did not work as well. Why should the
converter not work with etinc and work with a router?

Luiz





On Thu, 28 May 1998, Edwin Culp wrote:

> Luiz de Barros wrote:
> > 
> > Dear ALL,
> > 
> > We purchased an Etinc 5025PQ PCI quad syncronous E1/T1/Fractional card and
> > are havind a few problems putting it to work with more than 64Kbps.
> > We have a 256Kbps fractional E1 link provided by the TELCO via an HDSL
> > Termination Unit and a G.703 to V.35 E1 converter.
> > 
> > We would like to make a FreeBSD router, connecting our various networks
> > and holding our connection to internet.
> > 
> > The whole setup works fine with a cisco on the other side and IBM, Cisco
> > and Cyclades routers here at our ISP (Same CSU/DSU cable, connecting the
> > V.35 cable with the V.35 DTE cable from the router ). Etinc keeps saying
> > it is a clable problem, CSU/DSU problem, but how does it work with any
> > router?
> Why would you want to connect your etinc card to/through your cisco?
> Isn't that defeating the purpose?  What I would want, would be remove
> the cisco or if it were necessary for another connection use ethernet
> between it and my FreeBSD ROUTER.  Maybe I'm on another channel, and
> if I am please desregard the question.
> 
> ed
> 
> P.D.  I think the problem is cable incompatability.  I think Dennis once
> made that observation on the list.
> > 
> > I configured etinc port to PPP, HDLC, internal, external clock, changed
> > ifconfig parameters according to the manual and i am not being able to put
> > the link up and IP packets going from one side to the other at 256Kbps.
> > 
> > I purchased etinc because of good recomendations here on the list but as i
> > could see, the support from etinc is not as good as it should be.  Did
> > anybody already experienced any similar situation? Do i need to change
> > etinc's cable?  Does anybody know of any other card that can work in this
> > situation?
> > 
> > I have heard of many other choices of Sync cards and maybe next time i
> > will use another card, that can give me support to work with more than
> > 64Kbps. I used to recomend etinc to my friends because of its support to
> > FreeBSD, a Robust system with full support from the developers, etc but
> > now i am quite disappointed with etinc's support.
> > 
> > Luiz
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
> 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980528140025.7871A-100000>