Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:58:33 +0200 From: "Mustafa N. Deeb" <mustafa@palnet.com> To: "'Doug Hardie'" <bc979@lafn.org>, <freebsd-isp@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Clamav with sendmail Message-ID: <028801c3ee19$5ceb6670$8d00000a@felfel> In-Reply-To: <99DA0402-59C9-11D8-B162-000393681B06@lafn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It is better if you do have a quite large number of users; running clamav through procmail would put much load on the machine ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Mustafa N. Deeb Technical Director Palnet Communications Ltd. Tel: +970-2-2403434 Fax: +970-2-2403430 www.palsms.com www.paltime.net www.palnet.com -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Doug Hardie Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 1:59 AM To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Clamav with sendmail I am evaluating clamav for use with sendmail and an wondering if the clamav-milter that comes with it is the best approach. There are several other milter interfaces for clamav listed in the documentation. Is there any reason to use one in preference to the others? _______________________________________________ freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?028801c3ee19$5ceb6670$8d00000a>