Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2000 17:58:47 +0100 (CET) From: Andrzej Bialecki <abial@webgiro.com> To: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> Cc: Craig Shaver <craig@ProGroup.COM>, FreeBSD ISP List <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Java and FreeBSD Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.20.0003161754330.82593-100000@mx.webgiro.com> In-Reply-To: <200003161604.JAA14236@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Nate Williams wrote: > The reason for this is because the Blackdown team was given access to > the latest SUN JIT. It has very little to do with JDK1.2 and everything > to do with using a well designed JIT. > Again, this has little to do with it, and the biggest reason is because Really? I thought that native kernel threads would help for IO bound application.. > of the JIT. For a much better performing JDK 1.1.8, try using one of > the JIT's in the ports area, either TYA or ShuJIT. I've had good look > with the former... My point was that even with one of those JITs the performance is less than breathtaking. Don't take it personally, please - I know you spent tremendous efforts to make Java available on FreeBSD, and I admire you for that. But still, it's easy to make VolanoMark benchmark and see the results... Andrzej Bialecki // <abial@webgiro.com> WebGiro AB, Sweden (http://www.webgiro.com) // ------------------------------------------------------------------- // ------ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve. http://www.freebsd.org -------- // --- Small & Embedded FreeBSD: http://www.freebsd.org/~picobsd/ ---- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.20.0003161754330.82593-100000>