Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 10:05:09 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: Doug Rabson <dfr@nlsystems.com> Cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Thread Local Storage Message-ID: <20040330180509.GB57824@ns1.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <1080657646.18663.9.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10403300906270.11014-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> <1080657646.18663.9.camel@builder02.qubesoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 03:40:46PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote: > > > > I'd be in favor of not providing static thread libraries, > > but there was too much opposition when I brought it up... > > Bah. Static sucks. The only way I can see to make TLS work for static is > to implement it in the kernel and setup %gs in setregs :-(. Yes. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040330180509.GB57824>