Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 12:28:43 -0700 (MST) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: keramida@freebsd.org Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile Message-ID: <20071213.122843.-1827343505.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <20071213185208.GA3955@kobe.laptop> References: <200712130008.lBD082lO095232@repoman.freebsd.org> <200712112000.lBBK0tc3073820@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071213185208.GA3955@kobe.laptop>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
In message: <20071213185208.GA3955@kobe.laptop>
Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> writes:
: On 2007-12-11 20:00, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote:
: > Don't assume that make(1) is a bsd-like make program. It might not
: > be. This only matters in the early stages of bootstrapping, of
: > course, but gnu make can't handle bsd make Makefiles at all if they
: > use any of the 'dot' directives, which src/Makefile has in abudnance.
: >
: > Revision Changes Path
: > 1.343 +5 -3 src/Makefile
:
: On 2007-12-13 00:08, Warner Losh <imp@freebsd.org> wrote:
: > We don't need to invent BSDMAKE. ${MAKE} is sufficient.
: >
: > Submitted by: jmallet@
: >
: > Revision Changes Path
: > 1.344 +2 -3 src/Makefile
:
: Cool! That sounds like a step in a good direction, so we can override
: BSDMAKE in the first stages when /usr/bin/make is, say, gmake :)
Yes. These two changes make it so that one can say 'gerbilmake
buildworld' and have 'gerbilmake' be used for the validation and
bootstrapping FreeBSD's make.
Warner
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071213.122843.-1827343505.imp>