Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:25:45 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@over-yonder.net> Subject: Re: [CFR] Remove texinfo from base Message-ID: <20140625162545.GE23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <E6402E7B-7490-406A-B973-4642D590F040@bsdimp.com> References: <20140625103107.GB23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625104540.GE86779@over-yonder.net> <20140625105209.GC23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20140625110049.GF86779@over-yonder.net> <40EA1066-4776-4B2E-988A-9900BB842862@bsdimp.com> <20140625154758.GD23976@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <E6402E7B-7490-406A-B973-4642D590F040@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 09:09:30AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Jun 25, 2014, at 8:47 AM, Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 08:20:41AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >> > >> On Jun 25, 2014, at 4:00 AM, Matthew D. Fuller <fullermd@over-yonder.net> wrote: > >> > >>> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:52:10PM +0200 I heard the voice of > >>> Baptiste Daroussin, and lo! it spake thus: > >>>> > >>>> I have just committed the support for this in ports, anyway breakage > >>>> should be reported, right now it seems fine on my exp-run > >>> > >>> Oh, yes. Sorry, I did phrase that poorly. This shouldn't _break_ > >>> anything, but I suspect it will uncover existing-but-hidden breakage. > >>> > >>> Which is good. But does merit awareness that "hey, this will probably > >>> happen somewhere, so know this is a place to look when a build > >>> breaks". > >> > >> I know it will break certain nanobsd configurations that build ports because > >> dependencies there (at least for the ones I’ve done) aren’t well handled. So > >> I agree that this patch is missing, at the very least, an UPDATING entry and > >> a __FreeBSD_version bump. > > > > If you build a port that needs texinfo the port framework will do what it needs > > Except in environments that don’t do dependencies quite right, or where only a subset > of ports tree has been imported and texinfo isn’t part of that… But people with them > usually know, which is why UPDATING is needed. That’s all. There’s nothing else for you > to do. Yes sure UPDATING was anyway intended I'm not sure about the __FreeBSD_version. regards, Bapt [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlOq+AkACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Exx0gCfc9mwkKffv/zbBG+yPP8gy/Sd eG4An14wQFabTUU16j01sjo7u3eWNEV1 =tFgj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140625162545.GE23976>