Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 May 1999 14:19:53 +1000
From:      obituary <c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au>
To:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: More compiler option comparisons
Message-ID:  <374B7669.E8463ABF@atlas.newcastle.edu.au>
References:  <199905251635.MAA11353@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19990525133459.B17956@dan.emsphone.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson wrote:
> -O4 doesn't exist in egcs (or it didn't a month or so ago).  According
> to the source, -O2 enables all optimizations except -funroll-all-loops,
> and all -O3 does is enable -funroll-all-loops.

I think I recall reading somewhere that EGCS uses -O numbers > 3 to test
experimental optimizations.

-jake (obituary)			  Powered by FreeBSD
c9710216@atlas.newcastle.edu.au		http://www.freebsd.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?374B7669.E8463ABF>